Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 及更早版本允许攻击者通过涉及错误处理器设置的向量绕过沙盒保护机制。注意：存在此问题的原因是对 CVE-2018-17183 的修复不完整。
    (CVE-2018-17961)

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

这是对 Tavis Ormandy 报告中最新发现的 -dSAFER 问题的后续更新。Tavis Ormandy 发现，PostScript 语言解释器 Ghostscript 中存在多个漏洞，如果处理格式错误的 Postscript 文件，可导致拒绝服务、创建文件或任意代码执行（尽管已启用 dSAFER 沙盒）。对于 Debian 8“Jessie”，这些问题已在 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u11 版本中修复。我们建议您升级 ghostscript 程序包。注意：Tenable Network Security 已直接从 DLA 安全公告中提取上述描述块。Tenable 已尝试在不引入其他问题的情况下，尽可能进行自动整理和排版。

来自 Red Hat 安全公告 2018:3834：

ghostscript 的更新现在可用于 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7。

Red Hat 产品安全团队将此更新评级为具有重要安全影响。可从“参考”部分中的 CVE 链接获取通用漏洞评分系统 (CVSS) 基本分数，其针对每个漏洞给出了详细的严重性等级。

Ghostscript 套件包含用于渲染 PostScript 和 PDF 文档的实用工具。Ghostscript 可将 PostScript 代码转换成通用 bitmap 格式，使代码可以显示或打印。

安全修复：

* ghostscript：页面设备替换中释放逻辑不正确 (699664) (CVE-2018-16541)

* ghostscript：当异常处理期间堆栈用完时，不正确的“特权恢复”检查 (CVE-2018-16802)

* ghostscript：User-writable 错误异常表 (CVE-2018-17183)

* ghostscript：保存的执行堆栈可能泄露运算符数组（不完整的 CVE-2018-17183 修复） (CVE-2018-17961)

* ghostscript：保存的执行堆栈可能泄露运算符数组 (CVE-2018-18073)

* ghostscript：1Policy 运算符允许绕过沙盒保护 (CVE-2018-18284)

* ghostscript：setpattern 中的类型混淆 (700141) (CVE-2018-19134)

* ghostscript：在 psi/zdevice.c 中，错误实施 zsetdevice 函数中的安全检查 (CVE-2018-19409)

* ghostscript：在 aesdecode 运算符中，未初始化的内存访问 (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

有关此安全问题的详细信息，包括其影响、CVSS 分数和其他相关信息，请参阅列于“参考”部分的 CVE 页面。

Red Hat 在此感谢 Tavis Ormandy (Google Project Zero) 报告 CVE-2018-16541。

错误修复：

* 发现在处理着色对象期间，ghostscript-9.07-31.el7_6.1 引入了回归，从而造成“丢弃错误的平滑着色对象”警告。该更新已修复此回归，不会再发生所述问题。
(BZ#1657822)

The remote Redhat Enterprise Linux 7 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the RHSA-2018:3834 advisory.

  - ghostscript: Uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

  - ghostscript: Incorrect free logic in pagedevice replacement (699664) (CVE-2018-16541)

  - ghostscript: Incorrect restoration of privilege checking when running out of stack during exception     handling (CVE-2018-16802)

  - ghostscript: User-writable error exception table (CVE-2018-17183)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (incomplete fix for CVE-2018-17183)     (CVE-2018-17961)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (CVE-2018-18073)

  - ghostscript: 1Policy operator allows a sandbox protection bypass (CVE-2018-18284)

  - ghostscript: Type confusion in setpattern (700141) (CVE-2018-19134)

  - ghostscript: Improperly implemented security check in zsetdevice function in psi/zdevice.c     (CVE-2018-19409)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.

Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.

The Ghostscript suite contains utilities for rendering PostScript and PDF documents. Ghostscript translates PostScript code to common bitmap formats so that the code can be displayed or printed.

Security Fix(es) :

* ghostscript: Incorrect free logic in pagedevice replacement (699664) (CVE-2018-16541)

* ghostscript: Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking when running out of stack during exception handling (CVE-2018-16802)

* ghostscript: User-writable error exception table (CVE-2018-17183)

* ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (incomplete fix for CVE-2018-17183) (CVE-2018-17961)

* ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator arrays (CVE-2018-18073)

* ghostscript: 1Policy operator allows a sandbox protection bypass (CVE-2018-18284)

* ghostscript: Type confusion in setpattern (700141) (CVE-2018-19134)

* ghostscript: Improperly implemented security check in zsetdevice function in psi/zdevice.c (CVE-2018-19409)

* ghostscript: Uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

Red Hat would like to thank Tavis Ormandy (Google Project Zero) for reporting CVE-2018-16541.

Bug Fix(es) :

* It has been found that ghostscript-9.07-31.el7_6.1 introduced regression during the handling of shading objects, causing a 'Dropping incorrect smooth shading object' warning. With this update, the regression has been fixed and the described problem no longer occurs.
(BZ#1657822)

According to the versions of the ghostscript packages installed, the EulerOS installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - ghostscript: Incorrect 'restoration of privilege'     checking when running out of stack during exception     handling (CVE-2018-16802)

  - ghostscript: User-writable error exception table     (CVE-2018-17183)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator     arrays (incomplete fix for CVE-2018-17183)     (CVE-2018-17961)

  - ghostscript: Saved execution stacks can leak operator     arrays (CVE-2018-18073)

  - ghostscript: 1Policy operator allows a sandbox     protection bypass (CVE-2018-18284)

  - ghostscript: Type confusion in setpattern (700141)     (CVE-2018-19134)

  - ghostscript: Improperly implemented security check in     zsetdevice function in psi/zdevice.c (CVE-2018-19409)

  - ghostscript: Uninitialized memory access in the     aesdecode operator (699665) (CVE-2018-15911)

  - ghostscript: incomplete fix for CVE-2018-16509     (CVE-2018-16863)

  - ghostscript: gssetresolution and gsgetresolution memory     corruption(CVE-2018-16543)

  - ghostscript: use-after-free in copydevice     handling(CVE-2018-16540)

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

According to the versions of the ghostscript package installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     verify the key used in aesdecode. An attacker could     possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection     and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary     code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15911i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.25. Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking     when running out of stack during exception handling     could be used by attackers able to supply crafted     PostScript to execute code using the 'pipe'     instruction. This is due to an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-16509.i1/4^CVE-2018-16802i1/4%0

  - It was found that RHSA-2018:2918 did not fully fix     CVE-2018-16509. An attacker could possibly exploit     another variant of the flaw and bypass the -dSAFER     protection to, for example, execute arbitrary shell     commands via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16863i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable     error exception table, which could be used by remote     attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to     potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code.i1/4^CVE-2018-17183i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists     because of an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-17183.i1/4^CVE-2018-17961i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a     sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an     error object.i1/4^CVE-2018-18073i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator.i1/4^CVE-2018-18284i1/4%0

  - In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern     operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit     this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript     process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a     pattern dictionary was a structure     type.i1/4^CVE-2018-19134i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used.i1/4^CVE-2018-19409i1/4%0

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

According to the versions of the ghostscript package installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .tempfile     function did not properly handle file permissions. An     attacker could possibly exploit this to exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and delete files or     disclose their content via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15908i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .shfill operator     did not properly validate certain types. An attacker     could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER     protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15909i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     verify the key used in aesdecode. An attacker could     possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection     and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary     code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15911i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .type operator     did not properly validate its operands. A specially     crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash     ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the     context of the ghostscript process.i1/4^CVE-2018-16511i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript did not properly     restrict access to files open prior to enabling the
    -dSAFER mode. An attacker could possibly exploit this     to bypass the -dSAFER protection and disclose the     content of affected files via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16539i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript device cleanup     did not properly handle devices replaced with a null     device. An attacker could possibly exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or,     possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript     context via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16541i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.25. Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking     when running out of stack during exception handling     could be used by attackers able to supply crafted     PostScript to execute code using the 'pipe'     instruction. This is due to an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-16509.i1/4^CVE-2018-16802i1/4%0

  - It was found that RHSA-2018:2918 did not fully fix     CVE-2018-16509. An attacker could possibly exploit     another variant of the flaw and bypass the -dSAFER     protection to, for example, execute arbitrary shell     commands via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16863i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable     error exception table, which could be used by remote     attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to     potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code.i1/4^CVE-2018-17183i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists     because of an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-17183.i1/4^CVE-2018-17961i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a     sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an     error object.i1/4^CVE-2018-18073i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator.i1/4^CVE-2018-18284i1/4%0

  - In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern     operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit     this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript     process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a     pattern dictionary was a structure     type.i1/4^CVE-2018-19134i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used.i1/4^CVE-2018-19409i1/4%0

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

This update for ghostscript to version 9.26 fixes the following issues :

Security issues fixed :

CVE-2018-19475: Fixed bypass of an intended access restriction in psi/zdevice2.c (bsc#1117327)

CVE-2018-19476: Fixed bypass of an intended access restriction in psi/zicc.c (bsc#1117313)

CVE-2018-19477: Fixed bypass of an intended access restriction in psi/zfjbig2.c (bsc#1117274)

CVE-2018-19409: Check if another device is used correctly in LockSafetyParams (bsc#1117022)

CVE-2018-18284: Fixed potential sandbox escape through 1Policy operator (bsc#1112229)

CVE-2018-18073: Fixed leaks through operator in saved execution stacks (bsc#1111480)

CVE-2018-17961: Fixed a -dSAFER sandbox escape by bypassing executeonly (bsc#1111479)

CVE-2018-17183: Fixed a potential code injection by specially crafted PostScript files (bsc#1109105)

Version update to 9.26 (bsc#1117331): Security issues have been the primary focus

Minor bug fixes and improvements

For release summary see: http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/9.26/News.htm

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the SUSE security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

- rebase to latest upstream version 9.26

  - Security fix for CVE-2018-19478 CVE-2018-19134     CVE-2018-19477 CVE-2018-19476 CVE-2018-19475     CVE-2018-19409 CVE-2018-18284 CVE-2018-18073     CVE-2018-17961

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora update system website.
Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

According to the versions of the ghostscript package installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .tempfile     function did not properly handle file permissions. An     attacker could possibly exploit this to exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and delete files or     disclose their content via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15908i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .shfill operator     did not properly validate certain types. An attacker     could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER     protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15909i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     verify the key used in aesdecode. An attacker could     possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection     and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary     code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15911i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript .type operator     did not properly validate its operands. A specially     crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash     ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the     context of the ghostscript process.i1/4^CVE-2018-16511i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript did not properly     restrict access to files open prior to enabling the
    -dSAFER mode. An attacker could possibly exploit this     to bypass the -dSAFER protection and disclose the     content of affected files via a specially crafted     PostScript document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16539i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the ghostscript device cleanup     did not properly handle devices replaced with a null     device. An attacker could possibly exploit this to     bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or,     possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript     context via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16541i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.25. Incorrect 'restoration of privilege' checking     when running out of stack during exception handling     could be used by attackers able to supply crafted     PostScript to execute code using the 'pipe'     instruction. This is due to an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-16509.i1/4^CVE-2018-16802i1/4%0

  - It was found that RHSA-2018:2918 did not fully fix     CVE-2018-16509. An attacker could possibly exploit     another variant of the flaw and bypass the -dSAFER     protection to, for example, execute arbitrary shell     commands via a specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16863i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable     error exception table, which could be used by remote     attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to     potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code.i1/4^CVE-2018-17183i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists     because of an incomplete fix for     CVE-2018-17183.i1/4^CVE-2018-17961i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a     sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an     error object.i1/4^CVE-2018-18073i1/4%0

  - Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers     to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator.i1/4^CVE-2018-18284i1/4%0

  - In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern     operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit     this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript     process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a     pattern dictionary was a structure     type.i1/4^CVE-2018-19134i1/4%0

  - An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before     9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used.i1/4^CVE-2018-19409i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly     handle certain stack overflow error conditions. An     attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the
    -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly,     execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-16542i1/4%0

  - It was discovered that the type of the     LockDistillerParams parameter is not properly verified.
    An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the
    -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly,     execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a     specially crafted PostScript     document.i1/4^CVE-2018-15910i1/4%0

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

The version of ghostscript installed on the remote host is prior to 9.25-5. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ALAS2-2021-1598 advisory.

    Artifex Ghostscript before 9.25 allowed a user-writable error exception table, which could be used by     remote attackers able to supply crafted PostScript to potentially overwrite or replace error handlers to     inject code. (CVE-2018-17183)

    Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix forCVE-2018-17183.
    (CVE-2018-17961)

    Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of     system operators in the saved execution stack in an error object. (CVE-2018-18073)

    Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors     involving the 1Policy operator. (CVE-2018-18284)

    In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern operator did not properly validate certain types. A     specially crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute     arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript process. This is a type confusion issue because of     failure to check whether the Implementation of a pattern dictionary was a structure type. (CVE-2018-19134)

    An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if     another device is used. (CVE-2018-19409)

    psi/zdevice2.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access     restrictions because available stack space is not checked when the device remains the same.
    (CVE-2018-19475)

    psi/zicc.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access     restrictions because of a setcolorspace type confusion. (CVE-2018-19476)

    psi/zfjbig2.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access     restrictions because of a JBIG2Decode type confusion. (CVE-2018-19477)

    A flaw was found in the .pdf_hook_DSC_Creator procedure where it did not properly secure its privileged     calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could     disable security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14811)

    A flaw was found in the .setuserparams2 procedure where it did not properly secure its privileged calls,     enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could disable     security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14812)

    A flaw was found in the setsystemparams procedure where it did not properly secure its privileged calls,     enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could disable     security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14813)

    A flaw was found in the .pdfexectoken and other procedures where it did not properly secure its privileged     calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. A specially crafted PostScript file could     disable security protection and then have access to the file system, or execute arbitrary commands.
    (CVE-2019-14817)

    A flaw was found in the `.charkeys` procedure, where it did not properly secure its privileged calls,     enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. An attacker could abuse this flaw by creating a     specially crafted PostScript file that could escalate privileges within the Ghostscript and access files     outside of restricted areas or execute commands. (CVE-2019-14869)

    It was found that the superexec operator was available in the internal dictionary.  A specially crafted     PostScript file could use this flaw in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of     the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. (CVE-2019-3835)

    It was found that the forceput operator could be extracted from the DefineResource method. A specially     crafted PostScript file could use this flaw in order to, for example, have access to the file system     outside of the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. (CVE-2019-3838)

    It was found that some privileged operators remained accessible from various places after     theCVE-2019-6116fix. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw in order to, for example,     have access to the file system outside of the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. (CVE-2019-3839)

    It was found that ghostscript could leak sensitive operators on the operand stack when a pseudo-operator     pushes a subroutine. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw to escape the -dSAFER     protection in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of the SAFER constraints.
    (CVE-2019-6116)

Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the tested product security advisory.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

ID	Name	Product	Family	Published	Updated	Severity
222068	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞: CVE-2018-17961	Nessus	Misc.	3/4/2025	9/2/2025	high
118313	Debian DLA-1552-1：ghostscript 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	10/23/2018	7/29/2024	high
119757	Oracle Linux 7：ghostscript (ELSA-2018-3834)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	12/19/2018	11/1/2024	critical
119736	RHEL 7 : ghostscript (RHSA-2018:3834)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	12/18/2018	4/27/2024	critical
119754	CentOS 7 : ghostscript (CESA-2018:3834)	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	12/19/2018	8/21/2020	critical
122169	EulerOS 2.0 SP3 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1022)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2/14/2019	5/23/2022	critical
123895	EulerOS Virtualization 2.5.4 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1209)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	4/9/2019	5/20/2022	critical
123891	EulerOS Virtualization 2.5.3 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1205)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	4/9/2019	5/20/2022	critical
119651	SUSE SLED12 / SLES12 Security Update : ghostscript (SUSE-SU-2018:4090-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	12/13/2018	7/16/2024	critical
120186	SUSE SLED15 / SLES15 Security Update : ghostscript (SUSE-SU-2018:4087-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	1/2/2019	7/9/2024	critical
122284	Fedora 28 : ghostscript (2019-82acb29c1b)	Nessus	Fedora Local Security Checks	2/19/2019	6/20/2024	critical
121276	EulerOS Virtualization 2.5.1 : ghostscript (EulerOS-SA-2019-1016)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	1/22/2019	5/24/2022	critical
146633	Amazon Linux 2 : ghostscript (ALAS-2021-1598)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2/19/2021	12/11/2024	critical

Detections

Analytics

Plugins Search

high

high

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical

critical