The remote NewStart CGSL host, running version MAIN 6.02, has dnsmasq packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities:

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way     RRSets are sorted before validating with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who can forge DNS     replies such as that they are accepted as valid, could use this flaw to cause a buffer overflow with     arbitrary data in a heap memory segment, possibly executing code on the machine. The highest threat from     this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
    (CVE-2020-25681)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before 2.83. A buffer overflow vulnerability was discovered in the way dnsmasq     extract names from DNS packets before validating them with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who     can create valid DNS replies, could use this flaw to cause an overflow with arbitrary data in a heap-     allocated memory, possibly executing code on the machine. The flaw is in the rfc1035.c:extract_name()     function, which writes data to the memory pointed by name assuming MAXDNAME*2 bytes are available in the     buffer. However, in some code execution paths, it is possible extract_name() gets passed an offset from     the base buffer, thus reducing, in practice, the number of available bytes that can be written in the     buffer. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as     system availability. (CVE-2020-25682)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq     when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. A remote attacker, who can create     valid DNS replies, could use this flaw to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is     caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code     execute memcpy() with a negative size in get_rdata() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial     of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. (CVE-2020-25683)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in the forward.c:reply_query() if the reply destination address/port is used by the pending     forwarded queries. However, it does not use the address/port to retrieve the exact forwarded query,     substantially reducing the number of attempts an attacker on the network would have to perform to forge a     reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue contrasts with RFC5452, which specifies a query's     attributes that all must be used to match a reply. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25685 or CVE-2020-25686, the attack complexity of a successful     attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25684)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a     weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1     when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same     hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it     accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the     attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced.
    The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25685)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When receiving a query, dnsmasq does not check for an     existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request. By default, a maximum of 150     pending queries can be sent to upstream servers, so there can be at most 150 queries for the same name.
    This flaw allows an off-path attacker on the network to substantially reduce the number of attempts that     it would have to perform to forge a reply and have it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue is mentioned in the     Birthday Attacks section of RFC5452. If chained with CVE-2020-25684, the attack complexity of a     successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
    (CVE-2020-25686)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq     when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. This flaw allows a remote     attacker, who can create valid DNS replies, to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is     caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code     execute memcpy() with a negative size in sort_rrset() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial     of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. (CVE-2020-25687)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote SUSE Linux SLES11 host has a package installed that is affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the SUSE-SU-2021:14603-1 advisory.

  - A vulnerability was found in dnsmasq before version 2.81, where the memory leak allows remote attackers to     cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via vectors involving DHCP response creation.
    (CVE-2019-14834)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way     RRSets are sorted before validating with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who can forge DNS     replies such as that they are accepted as valid, could use this flaw to cause a buffer overflow with     arbitrary data in a heap memory segment, possibly executing code on the machine. The highest threat from     this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
    (CVE-2020-25681)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before 2.83. A buffer overflow vulnerability was discovered in the way dnsmasq     extract names from DNS packets before validating them with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who     can create valid DNS replies, could use this flaw to cause an overflow with arbitrary data in a heap-     allocated memory, possibly executing code on the machine. The flaw is in the rfc1035.c:extract_name()     function, which writes data to the memory pointed by name assuming MAXDNAME*2 bytes are available in the     buffer. However, in some code execution paths, it is possible extract_name() gets passed an offset from     the base buffer, thus reducing, in practice, the number of available bytes that can be written in the     buffer. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as     system availability. (CVE-2020-25682)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq     when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. A remote attacker, who can create     valid DNS replies, could use this flaw to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is     caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code     execute memcpy() with a negative size in get_rdata() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial     of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. (CVE-2020-25683)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in the forward.c:reply_query() if the reply destination address/port is used by the pending     forwarded queries. However, it does not use the address/port to retrieve the exact forwarded query,     substantially reducing the number of attempts an attacker on the network would have to perform to forge a     reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue contrasts with RFC5452, which specifies a query's     attributes that all must be used to match a reply. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25685 or CVE-2020-25686, the attack complexity of a successful     attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25684)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a     weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1     when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same     hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it     accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the     attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced.
    The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25685)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When receiving a query, dnsmasq does not check for an     existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request. By default, a maximum of 150     pending queries can be sent to upstream servers, so there can be at most 150 queries for the same name.
    This flaw allows an off-path attacker on the network to substantially reduce the number of attempts that     it would have to perform to forge a reply and have it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue is mentioned in the     Birthday Attacks section of RFC5452. If chained with CVE-2020-25684, the attack complexity of a     successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
    (CVE-2020-25686)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq     when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. This flaw allows a remote     attacker, who can create valid DNS replies, to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is     caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code     execute memcpy() with a negative size in sort_rrset() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial     of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. (CVE-2020-25687)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote CentOS Linux 7 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the CESA-2021:0153 advisory.

  - dnsmasq: loose address/port check in reply_query() makes forging replies easier for an off-path attacker     (CVE-2020-25684)

  - dnsmasq: loose query name check in reply_query() makes forging replies easier for an off-path attacker     (CVE-2020-25685)

  - dnsmasq: multiple queries forwarded for the same name makes forging replies easier for an off-path     attacker (CVE-2020-25686)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote NewStart CGSL host, running version CORE 5.04 / MAIN 5.04, has dnsmasq packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities:

  - A vulnerability was found in dnsmasq before version 2.81, where the memory leak allows remote attackers to     cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via vectors involving DHCP response creation.
    (CVE-2019-14834)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in the forward.c:reply_query() if the reply destination address/port is used by the pending     forwarded queries. However, it does not use the address/port to retrieve the exact forwarded query,     substantially reducing the number of attempts an attacker on the network would have to perform to forge a     reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue contrasts with RFC5452, which specifies a query's     attributes that all must be used to match a reply. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25685 or CVE-2020-25686, the attack complexity of a successful     attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25684)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a     weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1     when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same     hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it     accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the     attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced.
    The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25685)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When receiving a query, dnsmasq does not check for an     existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request. By default, a maximum of 150     pending queries can be sent to upstream servers, so there can be at most 150 queries for the same name.
    This flaw allows an off-path attacker on the network to substantially reduce the number of attempts that     it would have to perform to forge a reply and have it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue is mentioned in the     Birthday Attacks section of RFC5452. If chained with CVE-2020-25684, the attack complexity of a     successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
    (CVE-2020-25686)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote NewStart CGSL host, running version CORE 5.04 / MAIN 5.04, has dnsmasq packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities:

  - The DNS protocol, as implemented in (1) BIND 8 and 9 before 9.5.0-P1, 9.4.2-P1, and 9.3.5-P1; (2)     Microsoft DNS in Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2; and other implementations     allow remote attackers to spoof DNS traffic via a birthday attack that uses in-bailiwick referrals to     conduct cache poisoning against recursive resolvers, related to insufficient randomness of DNS transaction     IDs and source ports, aka DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability or the Kaminsky bug.
    (CVE-2008-1447)

  - Heap-based buffer overflow in the tftp_request function in tftp.c in dnsmasq before 2.50, when --enable-     tftp is used, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a TFTP packet,     as demonstrated by a read (aka RRQ) request. (CVE-2009-2957)

  - The tftp_request function in tftp.c in dnsmasq before 2.50, when --enable-tftp is used, allows remote     attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a TFTP read (aka     RRQ) request with a malformed blksize option. (CVE-2009-2958)

  - Dnsmasq before 2.66test2, when used with certain libvirt configurations, replies to queries from     prohibited interfaces, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (traffic amplification)     via spoofed TCP based DNS queries. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for     CVE-2012-3411. (CVE-2013-0198)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in the forward.c:reply_query() if the reply destination address/port is used by the pending     forwarded queries. However, it does not use the address/port to retrieve the exact forwarded query,     substantially reducing the number of attempts an attacker on the network would have to perform to forge a     reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue contrasts with RFC5452, which specifies a query's     attributes that all must be used to match a reply. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25685 or CVE-2020-25686, the attack complexity of a successful     attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25684)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a     weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1     when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same     hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it     accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the     attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced.
    The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25685)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When receiving a query, dnsmasq does not check for an     existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request. By default, a maximum of 150     pending queries can be sent to upstream servers, so there can be at most 150 queries for the same name.
    This flaw allows an off-path attacker on the network to substantially reduce the number of attempts that     it would have to perform to forge a reply and have it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue is mentioned in the     Birthday Attacks section of RFC5452. If chained with CVE-2020-25684, the attack complexity of a     successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
    (CVE-2020-25686)

  - An issue was discovered in Dnsmasq before 2.90. The default maximum EDNS.0 UDP packet size was set to 4096     but should be 1232 because of DNS Flag Day 2020. (CVE-2023-28450)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Oracle Linux 7 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ELSA-2021-0153 advisory. Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Redhat Enterprise Linux 7 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the RHSA-2021:0153 advisory.

  - dnsmasq: loose address/port check in reply_query() makes forging replies easier for an off-path attacker     (CVE-2020-25684)

  - dnsmasq: loose query name check in reply_query() makes forging replies easier for an off-path attacker     (CVE-2020-25685)

  - dnsmasq: multiple queries forwarded for the same name makes forging replies easier for an off-path     attacker (CVE-2020-25686)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of dnsmasq installed on the remote host is prior to 2.76-16. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ALAS2-2021-1587 advisory.

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in the forward.c:reply_query() if the reply destination address/port is used by the pending     forwarded queries. However, it does not use the address/port to retrieve the exact forwarded query,     substantially reducing the number of attempts an attacker on the network would have to perform to forge a     reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue contrasts with RFC5452, which specifies a query's     attributes that all must be used to match a reply. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25685 or CVE-2020-25686, the attack complexity of a successful     attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25684)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq     checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a     weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1     when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same     hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it     accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the     attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache     Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced.
    The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. (CVE-2020-25685)

  - A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When receiving a query, dnsmasq does not check for an     existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request. By default, a maximum of 150     pending queries can be sent to upstream servers, so there can be at most 150 queries for the same name.
    This flaw allows an off-path attacker on the network to substantially reduce the number of attempts that     it would have to perform to forge a reply and have it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue is mentioned in the     Birthday Attacks section of RFC5452. If chained with CVE-2020-25684, the attack complexity of a     successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
    (CVE-2020-25686)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

ID	Name	Product	Family	Published	Updated	Severity
147341	NewStart CGSL MAIN 6.02 : dnsmasq Multiple Vulnerabilities (NS-SA-2021-0091)	Nessus	NewStart CGSL Local Security Checks	3/10/2021	12/5/2022	high
150612	SUSE SLES11 Security Update : dnsmasq (SUSE-SU-2021:14603-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	6/10/2021	12/6/2022	high
145439	CentOS 7 : dnsmasq (CESA-2021:0153)	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	1/26/2021	12/5/2022	low
154478	NewStart CGSL CORE 5.04 / MAIN 5.04 : dnsmasq Multiple Vulnerabilities (NS-SA-2021-0098)	Nessus	NewStart CGSL Local Security Checks	10/27/2021	12/5/2022	low
193540	NewStart CGSL CORE 5.04 / MAIN 5.04 : dnsmasq Multiple Vulnerabilities (NS-SA-2024-0011)	Nessus	NewStart CGSL Local Security Checks	4/18/2024	4/19/2024	medium
145075	Oracle Linux 7 : dnsmasq (ELSA-2021-0153)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	1/19/2021	12/7/2022	low
145087	RHEL 7 : dnsmasq (RHSA-2021:0153)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	1/19/2021	5/24/2023	low
145454	Amazon Linux 2 : dnsmasq (ALAS-2021-1587)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	1/26/2021	12/5/2022	low

Detections

Analytics

Plugins Search

high

high

low

low

medium

low

low

low