http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3191

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196323

https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/commit/6e76e9b9fa845b76b0b9a45f05f4b54a052578ff

GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate. (CVE-2015-0294)

Impact

GnuTLS does not check if all sections of X.509 certificates indicate the same signature algorithm. This flaw, in combination with a different flaw, can lead to a bypass of the certificate signature check.

It was found that GnuTLS did not check activation and expiration dates of CA certificates. This could cause an application using GnuTLS to incorrectly accept a certificate as valid when its issuing CA is already expired. (CVE-2014-8155)

It was found that GnuTLS did not verify whether a hashing algorithm listed in a signature matched the hashing algorithm listed in the certificate. An attacker could create a certificate that used a different hashing algorithm than it claimed, possibly causing GnuTLS to use an insecure, disallowed hashing algorithm during certificate verification. (CVE-2015-0282)

It was discovered that GnuTLS did not check if all sections of X.509 certificates indicate the same signature algorithm. This flaw, in combination with a different flaw, could possibly lead to a bypass of the certificate signature check. (CVE-2015-0294)

It was found that GnuTLS did not check activation and expiration dates of CA certificates. This could cause an application using GnuTLS to incorrectly accept a certificate as valid when its issuing CA is already expired. (CVE-2014-8155)

It was found that GnuTLS did not verify whether a hashing algorithm listed in a signature matched the hashing algorithm listed in the certificate. An attacker could create a certificate that used a different hashing algorithm than it claimed, possibly causing GnuTLS to use an insecure, disallowed hashing algorithm during certificate verification. (CVE-2015-0282)

It was discovered that GnuTLS did not check if all sections of X.509 certificates indicate the same signature algorithm. This flaw, in combination with a different flaw, could possibly lead to a bypass of the certificate signature check. (CVE-2015-0294)

The CVE-2014-8155 issue was discovered by Marcel Kolaja of Red Hat.
The CVE-2015-0282 and CVE-2015-0294 issues were discovered by Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos of the Red Hat Security Technologies Team.

This update also fixes the following bug :

  - Previously, under certain circumstances, the certtool     utility could generate X.509 certificates which     contained a negative modulus. Consequently, such     certificates could have interoperation problems with the     software using them. The bug has been fixed, and     certtool no longer generates X.509 certificates     containing a negative modulus.

The remote OracleVM system is missing necessary patches to address critical security updates :

  - fix CVE-2015-0282 (#1198159)

  - fix CVE-2015-0294 (#1198159)

  - Corrected value initialization in mpi printing     (#1129241)

  - Check for expiry information in the CA certificates     (#1159778)

  - fix issue with integer padding in certificates and keys     (#1036385)

  - fix session ID length check (#1102025)

  - fix CVE-2014-0092 (#1069891)

  - fix CVE-2013-2116 - fix DoS regression in     (CVE-2013-1619) upstream patch (#966754)

  - fix CVE-2013-1619 - fix TLS-CBC timing attack (#908238)

From Red Hat Security Advisory 2015:1457 :

Updated gnutls packages that fix three security issues and one bug are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.

Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having Moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section.

The GnuTLS library provides support for cryptographic algorithms and for protocols such as Transport Layer Security (TLS).

It was found that GnuTLS did not check activation and expiration dates of CA certificates. This could cause an application using GnuTLS to incorrectly accept a certificate as valid when its issuing CA is already expired. (CVE-2014-8155)

It was found that GnuTLS did not verify whether a hashing algorithm listed in a signature matched the hashing algorithm listed in the certificate. An attacker could create a certificate that used a different hashing algorithm than it claimed, possibly causing GnuTLS to use an insecure, disallowed hashing algorithm during certificate verification. (CVE-2015-0282)

It was discovered that GnuTLS did not check if all sections of X.509 certificates indicate the same signature algorithm. This flaw, in combination with a different flaw, could possibly lead to a bypass of the certificate signature check. (CVE-2015-0294)

The CVE-2014-8155 issue was discovered by Marcel Kolaja of Red Hat.
The CVE-2015-0282 and CVE-2015-0294 issues were discovered by Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos of the Red Hat Security Technologies Team.

This update also fixes the following bug :

* Previously, under certain circumstances, the certtool utility could generate X.509 certificates which contained a negative modulus.
Consequently, such certificates could have interoperation problems with the software using them. The bug has been fixed, and certtool no longer generates X.509 certificates containing a negative modulus.
(BZ#1036385)

Users of gnutls are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to correct these issues.

Updated gnutls packages that fix three security issues and one bug are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.

Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having Moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section.

The GnuTLS library provides support for cryptographic algorithms and for protocols such as Transport Layer Security (TLS).

It was found that GnuTLS did not check activation and expiration dates of CA certificates. This could cause an application using GnuTLS to incorrectly accept a certificate as valid when its issuing CA is already expired. (CVE-2014-8155)

It was found that GnuTLS did not verify whether a hashing algorithm listed in a signature matched the hashing algorithm listed in the certificate. An attacker could create a certificate that used a different hashing algorithm than it claimed, possibly causing GnuTLS to use an insecure, disallowed hashing algorithm during certificate verification. (CVE-2015-0282)

It was discovered that GnuTLS did not check if all sections of X.509 certificates indicate the same signature algorithm. This flaw, in combination with a different flaw, could possibly lead to a bypass of the certificate signature check. (CVE-2015-0294)

The CVE-2014-8155 issue was discovered by Marcel Kolaja of Red Hat.
The CVE-2015-0282 and CVE-2015-0294 issues were discovered by Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos of the Red Hat Security Technologies Team.

This update also fixes the following bug :

* Previously, under certain circumstances, the certtool utility could generate X.509 certificates which contained a negative modulus.
Consequently, such certificates could have interoperation problems with the software using them. The bug has been fixed, and certtool no longer generates X.509 certificates containing a negative modulus.
(BZ#1036385)

Users of gnutls are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to correct these issues.

gnutls was updated to fix a certificate algorithm consistency checking issue. (CVE-2015-0294)

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the SUSE security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

GnuTLS was updated to fix two security issues :

  - A certificate algorithm consistency checking issue was     fixed, where GnuTLS did not check whether the two     signature algorithms match on certificate import. This     problem is not deemed to be exploitable currently.
    (CVE-2015-0294)

  - GNUTLS-SA-2015-1: GnuTLS did not verify the RSA PKCS #1     signature algorithm to match the signature algorithm in     the certificate, leading to a potential downgrade to a     disallowed algorithm, such as MD5, without detecting it.
    (CVE-2015-0282)

gnutls was updated to fix a security issue :

A certificate algorithm consistency checking issue was fixed (CVE-2015-0294).

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in GnuTLS, a library implementing the TLS and SSL protocols. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following problems :

CVE-2014-8155

Missing date/time checks on CA certificates

CVE-2015-0282

GnuTLS does not verify the RSA PKCS #1 signature algorithm to match the signature algorithm in the certificate, leading to a potential downgrade to a disallowed algorithm without detecting it.

CVE-2015-0294

GnuTLS does not check whether the two signature algorithms match on certificate import.

NOTE: Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the DLA security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

It was discovered that GnuTLS did not perform date and time checks on CA certificates, contrary to expectations. This issue only affected Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. (CVE-2014-8155)

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos discovered that GnuTLS incorrectly verified that signature algorithms matched. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to downgrade to a disallowed algorithm. This issue only affected Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
(CVE-2015-0282)

It was discovered that GnuTLS incorrectly verified certificate algorithms. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to downgrade to a disallowed algorithm. (CVE-2015-0294).

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in GnuTLS, a library implementing the TLS and SSL protocols. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following problems :

  - CVE-2015-0282     GnuTLS does not verify the RSA PKCS #1 signature     algorithm to match the signature algorithm in the     certificate, leading to a potential downgrade to a     disallowed algorithm without detecting it.

  - CVE-2015-0294     It was reported that GnuTLS does not check whether the     two signature algorithms match on certificate import.

ID	Name	Product	Family	Severity
123838	F5 Networks BIG-IP : GnuTLS vulnerability (K54022413)	Nessus	F5 Networks Local Security Checks	high
85230	Amazon Linux AMI : gnutls (ALAS-2015-575)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	high
85193	Scientific Linux Security Update : gnutls on SL6.x i386/x86_64 (20150722)	Nessus	Scientific Linux Local Security Checks	high
85142	OracleVM 3.3 : gnutls (OVMSA-2015-0101)	Nessus	OracleVM Local Security Checks	high
85109	Oracle Linux 6 : gnutls (ELSA-2015-1457)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	high
85023	CentOS 6 : gnutls (CESA-2015:1457)	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	high
84949	RHEL 6 : gnutls (RHSA-2015:1457)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	high
83715	SUSE SLED12 / SLES12 Security Update : gnutls (SUSE-SU-2015:0735-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	high
82639	SuSE 11.3 Security Update : GnuTLS (SAT Patch Number 10536)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	medium
82460	openSUSE Security Update : gnutls (openSUSE-2015-269)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	high
82166	Debian DLA-180-1 : gnutls26 security update	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	high
82024	Ubuntu 10.04 LTS / 12.04 LTS / 14.04 LTS / 14.10 : gnutls26, gnutls28 vulnerabilities (USN-2540-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	high
81835	Debian DSA-3191-1 : gnutls26 - security update	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	high

CVE-2015-0294

high

New! CVE Severity Now Using CVSS v3

Description

References

Details

Risk Information

CVSS v2

CVSS v3

Vulnerable Software

Configuration 1

Configuration 2

Configuration 3

Tenable Plugins

high

high

high

high

high

high

high

high

medium

high

high

high

high