| CVE-2025-62810 | Rejected reason: Not used | No Score |
| CVE-2025-62809 | Rejected reason: Not used | No Score |
| CVE-2025-62808 | Rejected reason: Not used | No Score |
| CVE-2025-62807 | Rejected reason: Not used | No Score |
| CVE-2025-62806 | Rejected reason: Not used | No Score |
| CVE-2025-62805 | Rejected reason: Not used | No Score |
| CVE-2025-62804 | Rejected reason: Not used | No Score |
| CVE-2025-11575 | Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in MongoDB Atlas SQL ODBC driver on Windows allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects MongoDB Atlas SQL ODBC driver: from 1.0.0 through 2.0.0. | high |
| CVE-2025-6601 | The vulnerability exists due to a business logic error in group memberships. A remote administrator can exploit the access request approval workflow and gain unauthorized project access. | medium |
| CVE-2025-11989 | The vulnerability exists due to missing authorization in quick actions. A remote user can include malicious commands in specific descriptions and execute unauthorized quick actions. | medium |
| CVE-2025-11974 | The vulnerability exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in upload. A remote user can pass specially crafted input to the application and perform a denial of service (DoS) attack. | medium |
| CVE-2025-11971 | The vulnerability exists due to incorrect authorization in pipeline builds. A remote user can manipulate commits and trigger unauthorized pipeline executions. | medium |
| CVE-2025-11702 | The vulnerability exists due to improper access restrictions in runner API. A remote user can bypass implemented security restrictions and hijack project runners from other projects. | medium |
| CVE-2025-11447 | The vulnerability exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker can send malicious GraphQL requests with crafted JSON payloads and perform a denial of service (DoS) attack. | medium |
| CVE-2025-10497 | The vulnerability exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in event collection. A remote attacker can pass specially crafted input to the application and perform a denial of service (DoS) attack. | medium |
| CVE-2025-62710 | Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk. | low |
| CVE-2025-62708 | pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3. | high |
| CVE-2025-62707 | pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3. | high |
| CVE-2025-62706 | Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting. | medium |
| CVE-2025-62705 | OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2. | medium |
| CVE-2025-62617 | Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 4.3.17, an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the member assignment data retrieval functionality of Admidio. Any authenticated user with permissions to assign members to a role (such as an administrator) can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary SQL commands. This can lead to a full compromise of the application's database, including reading, modifying, or deleting all data. This issue has been patched in version 4.3.17. | high |
| CVE-2025-62614 | BookLore is a self-hosted web app for organizing and managing personal book collections. In versions 1.8.1 and prior, an authentication bypass vulnerability in the BookMediaController allows any unauthenticated user to access and download book covers, thumbnails, and complete PDF/CBX page content without authorization. The vulnerability exists because multiple media endpoints lack proper access control annotations, and the CoverJwtFilter continues request processing even when no authentication token is provided. This enables attackers to enumerate and exfiltrate all book content from the system, bypassing the intended download permissions (canDownload) entirely. This issue has been patched via commit b226c43. | high |
| CVE-2025-62613 | VDO.Ninja is a tool that brings remote video feeds into OBS or other studio software via WebRTC. From versions 28.0 to before 28.4, a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists on examples/control.html through the room parameter, which is improperly sanitized before being rendered in the DOM. The application fails to validate and encode user input, allowing malicious scripts to be injected and executed. This issue has been patched in version 28.4. | medium |
| CVE-2025-62612 | FastGPT is an AI Agent building platform. Prior to version 4.11.1, in the workflow file reading node, the network link is not security-verified, posing a risk of SSRF attacks. This issue has been patched in version 4.11.1. | medium |
| CVE-2025-62611 | aiomysql is a library for accessing a MySQL database from the asyncio. Prior to version 0.3.0, the client-side settings are not checked before sending local files to MySQL server, which allows obtaining arbitrary files from the client using a rogue server. It is possible to create a rogue MySQL server that emulates authorization, ignores client flags and requests arbitrary files from the client by sending a LOAD_LOCAL instruction packet. This issue has been patched in version 0.3.0. | high |
| CVE-2025-62610 | Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. In versions from 1.1.0 to before 4.10.2, Hono’s JWT Auth Middleware does not provide a built-in aud (Audience) verification option, which can cause confused-deputy / token-mix-up issues: an API may accept a valid token that was issued for a different audience (e.g., another service) when multiple services share the same issuer/keys. This can lead to unintended cross-service access. Hono’s docs list verification options for iss/nbf/iat/exp only, with no aud support; RFC 7519 requires that when an aud claim is present, tokens MUST be rejected unless the processing party identifies itself in that claim. This issue has been patched in version 4.10.2. | high |
| CVE-2025-62513 | OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. In versions 2.2.0 to 2.4.1, OpenBao's audit log experienced a regression wherein raw HTTP bodies used by few endpoints were not correctly redacted (HMAC'd). This impacts those using the ACME functionality of PKI, resulting in short-lived ACME verification challenge codes being leaked in the audit logs. Additionally, this impacts those using the OIDC issuer functionality of the identity subsystem, auth and token response codes along with claims could be leaked in the audit logs. ACME verification codes are not usable after verification or challenge expiry so are of limited long-term use. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2. | medium |
| CVE-2025-62247 | Missing Authorization in Collection Provider component in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.9, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.16, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.19 allows instance users to read and select unauthorized Blueprints through the Collection Providers across instances. | low |
| CVE-2025-62248 | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability, resulting from a regression, has been identified in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.9, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.16, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.1 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.19 allows a remote, authenticated attacker to inject and execute JavaScript code via the _com_liferay_dynamic_data_mapping_web_portlet_DDMPortlet_definition parameter. The malicious payload is executed within the victim's browser when they access a URL that includes the crafted parameter. | medium |
| CVE-2025-58712 | A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain AMQ Broker images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. | medium |
| CVE-2025-60343 | Multiple buffer overflows in the AdvSetMacMtuWan function of Tenda AC6 v.15.03.06.50 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting a crafted payload into the wanMTU, wanSpeed, cloneType, mac, serviceName, serverName, wanMTU2, wanSpeed2, cloneType2, mac2, serviceName2, and serverName2 parameters. | high |
| CVE-2025-60342 | Tenda AC6 V2.0 15.03.06.50 was discovered to contain a stack overflow in the page parameter in the addressNat function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | high |
| CVE-2025-60341 | Tenda AC6 V2.0 15.03.06.50 was discovered to contain a stack overflow in the ssid parameter in the fast_setting_wifi_set function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | high |
| CVE-2025-60340 | Multiple buffer overflows in the SetClientState function of Tenda AC6 v.15.03.06.50 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting a crafted payload into the limitSpeed, deviceId, and limitSpeedUp parameters. | high |
| CVE-2025-60339 | Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the openSchedWifi function of Tenda AC6 v.15.03.06.50 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting a crafted payload into the schedStartTime and schedEndTime parameters. | high |
| CVE-2025-60337 | Tenda AC6 V2.0 15.03.06.50 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the speed_dir parameter in the SetSpeedWan function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | high |
| CVE-2025-60336 | A NULL pointer dereference in the sub_41773C function of TOTOLINK N600R v4.3.0cu.7866_B20220506 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP request. | high |
| CVE-2025-24934 | Software which sets SO_REUSEPORT_LB on a socket and then connects it to a host will not directly observe any problems. However, due to its membership in a load-balancing group, that socket will receive packets originating from any host. This breaks the contract of the connect(2) and implied connect via sendto(2), and may leave the application vulnerable to spoofing attacks. The kernel failed to check the connection state of sockets when adding them to load-balancing groups. Furthermore, when looking up the destination socket for an incoming packet, the kernel will match a socket belonging to a load-balancing group even if it is connected, in violation of the contract that connected sockets are only supposed to receive packets originating from the connected host. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22178 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to view items on the "Why" page. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22177 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to view other team overviews. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22176 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to view audit log items. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22175 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to modify the steps of another user's private checklist. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22174 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to view portfolio rooms without the required permission. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22173 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to view certain sprint data without the required permission. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22172 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to read external reports without the required permission. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22171 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user is able to alter the private checklists of other users. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22170 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user without sufficient privileges to perform an action could if they included a particular state-related parameter of a user with sufficient privileges to perform the action. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22169 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to subscribe to an item/object without having the expected permission level. | medium |
| CVE-2025-22168 | Jira Align is vulnerable to an authorization issue. A low-privilege user can access unexpected endpoints that disclose a small amount of sensitive information. For example, a low-level user was able to read the steps of another user's private checklist. | medium |
| CVE-2025-11958 | An improper input validation in the Security Dashboard ignored-tasks API of Devolutions Server 2025.2.15.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user to cause a denial of service to the Security Dashboard via a crafted request. | medium |
